Risk Assessment of the Implementation of PPP Scheme in Natural Gas Network Project for Households (Case Study: Natural Gas Network for Households in Batam City)

Authors

  • Yanuar Tri Wibowo Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i3.1789

Keywords:

risk, critical risk, infrastructure, natural gas network for households, natural gas, PPP, fuzzy synthetic

Abstract

The government is actively promoting the use of natural gas over petroleum through the Natural Gas Network for Households (Jargas) program. Due to budget limitations, Jargas development has been gradual, achieving 881,752 Household Connections (SR) by 2022. To accelerate progress, the government is utilizing a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model, as outlined in the National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN) 2020-2024. This plan targets the construction of 2.5 million SR under the PPP scheme, with Batam City earmarked for 307,749 SR. As this is the first application of the PPP model in Jargas development and no prior risk assessment exists, it is crucial to identify potential risks. This research aims to identify critical risks associated with the PPP scheme. The methodology includes qualitative and quantitative analyses. Initially, qualitative analysis identifies and ranks risks, followed by quantitative analysis using the fuzzy synthetic method to precisely evaluate high-risk levels and identify critical risks. The analysis revealed 91 potential risks, categorized as 17 high-level, 43 medium-high-level, 26 medium-level, and 5 low-level risks. The fuzzy quantitative analysis of high-level risks identified 10 critical risks: delays and cost increases in land acquisition, delays in permit issuance, project lender default, failure to obtain environmental approval, construction delays, extreme weather, rising construction costs, inflation and interest rate fluctuations, flood-prone land, and scope creep. These findings provide essential insights for managing and mitigating risks in Jargas development projects.

References

Aloko, M.N. (2018). Risk Assessment Process for Construction Projects in Afghanistan, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science (IJAERS), 5(8), 211-217.

Andrić, J. M., Wang, J., and Zhong, R. (2019): Identifying the critical risks in railway projects based on fuzzy and sensitivity analysis: a case study of belt and road projects, Sustainability, 11(5), 1302.

Azorin, J.F. (2016). Mixed methods research: An opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills. European Journal of Management and Business Economics 25(2):37-38

Presidential Regulation Number 6 of 2019. Provision and Distribution of Natural Gas Through Natural Gas Transmission and/or Distribution Networks for Households and Small Customers. Jakarta.

Palupie, Y.M.R. and Yuniarto, H.A. (2016). Risk Allocation of Infrastructure Projects Using Government and Business Entity Cooperation (KPBU) Schemes: A Literature Review, Gadjah Mada University National Seminar on Industrial Engineering. Yogyakarta.

Project Management Institute (2013). Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) Guide

PMI. (2013): A Guide to the project management body of knowledge – PMBOK Guide Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania, 65-90.

PMI. (2009): Practice standard for project risk management, Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania, 89-90.

PT. Indonesian Infrastructure Guarantee (2023). 2023 Risk Allocation Reference for Government Collaboration with Business Entities (KPBU).

National Medium Term Development Plan (RPJMN) 2020 – 2024.

Zhou, Y., Zheng, S., Hu, Z., and Chen, Y. (2022): Metro station risk classification based on smart card data: A case study in Beijing, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 594, 127019.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-20

How to Cite

Wibowo, Y. T. (2025). Risk Assessment of the Implementation of PPP Scheme in Natural Gas Network Project for Households (Case Study: Natural Gas Network for Households in Batam City). Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 5(3), 2835–2850. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i3.1789