Bridging Innovation and Emissions Reduction: How Energy Public R&D Investments Shape Decarbonization Across Economic Divides

Authors

  • Nugroho Imperial College London, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i2.50858

Keywords:

Energy public R&D, Income level, Emission reduction

Abstract

This research investigates how public research investments in energy affect greenhouse gas emission reductions across nations with varying income levels. The OLS regression analysis shows a significant negative correlation, indicating that increased public funding for clean energy innovation leads to decarbonization. GDP and population size remain the main factors driving emissions despite research efforts, illustrating the challenging task of achieving both economic growth and sustainability. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) helped mitigate selection bias and solidify the causal connection between R&D investments and emissions reductions. Despite their leadership in R&D investment, high-income countries maintain elevated per capita emissions, demonstrating that technological innovation must be supported by additional policies, including carbon pricing and regulatory measures. Lower-income nations face substantial financial obstacles to clean energy development, highlighting the necessity for global partnerships, along with technology sharing and international financial support models.

References

Caglar, A. E., & Ulug, M. (2022). The role of government spending on energy efficiency R&D budgets in the green transformation process: insight from the top-five countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(50), 76472–76484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21133-w

Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., Smyth, R., & Zhang, X. (2018). R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014. Energy Economics, 80, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.020

EDGAR. (2024). GHG emissions of all world countries. EDGAR - Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2023

Fragkiadakis, K., Fragkos, P., & Paroussos, L. (2020). Low-Carbon R&D Can Boost EU Growth and Competitiveness. Energies, 13(19), 5236. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195236

Garrone, P., & Grilli, L. (2010). Is there a relationship between public expenditures in energy R&D and carbon emissions per GDP? An empirical investigation. Energy Policy, 38(10), 5600–5613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.057

Hailemariam, A., Ivanovski, K., & Dzhumashev, R. (2022). Does R&D investment in renewable energy technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Applied Energy, 327, 120056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120056

OECD. (2024). Green growth. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/

The International Energy Agency (IEA). (2024). Emissions grew in 2023, but clean energy is limiting the growth. Retrieved January 25, 2025, from https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2023/emissions-grew-in-2023-but-clean-energy-is-limiting-the-growth

Tudor, C., & Sova, R. (2022). Driving Factors for R&D Intensity: Evidence from Global and Income-Level Panels. Sustainability, 14(3), 1854. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031854

Wang, X., Wang, Y., and Wei, C. (2023). The impact of natural resource abundance on green economic growth in the Belt and Road countries: the role of institutional quality. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 98, 106977. https://doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106977

World Bank. (2024). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL

World Bank. (2024a). World Bank Country and Lending Groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/

Zhang, F., Gallagher, K. S., Myslikov a, Z., Narassimhan, E., Bhandary, R. R., & Huang, P. (2021). From fossil to low carbon: The evolution of global public energy innovation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.734

Downloads

Published

2025-02-20

How to Cite

Nugroho, N. (2025). Bridging Innovation and Emissions Reduction: How Energy Public R&D Investments Shape Decarbonization Across Economic Divides. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 5(2), 2081–2099. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i2.50858