Classification of Vertical and Lateral Track Irregularities using GoogleNet from Gramian Angular Summation Field Encoding

Authors

  • Gemuruh Geo Pratama Institut Teknologi Banding, Indonesia
  • Vani Virdyawan Institut Teknologi Banding, Indonesia
  • Yunendar Aryo Handoko Institut Teknologi Banding, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i2.50895

Keywords:

vehicle dynamic response, googlenet, gramian angular summation field, logistic regression, xgboost

Abstract

The ability to classify track conditions has become a critical issue in the railway industry, as delayed detection or unaddressed adverse track conditions can profoundly impact railway safety. Current track maintenance primarily relies on manual inspections and specialized monitoring vehicles, which are constrained by their inspection frequency. Deploying models that correlate vehicle dynamic responses with track conditions in in-service trains could significantly enhance fault detection. However, existing studies utilizing machine learning approaches are notably limited in capturing complex time-series information from vehicle dynamic responses, especially when the data are derived from real measurements rather than simulations. To address these challenges, we propose the application of GoogleNet and Gramian Angular Summation Field (GASF) transformation for classifying track conditions using vehicle dynamic responses. For comparison, we will demonstrate the limitations of traditional machine learning approaches, specifically Logistic Regression and XGBoost, where only the standard deviation and peak value are extracted as features. Subsequently, we propose our approach using the GoogleNet architecture, combined with GASF to transform the time-series data into image representations. Our proposed model achieves high accuracy, in classifying vertical and lateral track conditions, significantly outperforming the machine learning model. The results of this study demonstrate that our proposed method can learn complex nonlinear features, and make accurate classifications. Additionally, the study highlights the inability of the machine learning model, to classify track conditions accurately, and provides evidence that standard deviation and peak value are insufficient as features for complex systems like vehicle dynamic responses

References

De Rosa, A., Kulkarni, R., Qazizadeh, A., Berg, M., Di Gialleonardo, E., Facchinetti, A., & Bruni, S. (2021). Monitoring of lateral and cross level track geometry irregularities through onboard vehicle dynamics measurements using machine learning classification algorithms. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 235(1), 107–120.

Hatami, N., Gavet, Y., & Debayle, J. (2018). Classification of time-series images using deep convolutional neural networks. Tenth International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2017), 10696, 242–249.

Hoang, D.-T., & Kang, H.-J. (2019). A survey on deep learning based bearing fault diagnosis. Neurocomputing, 335, 327–335.

Hong, K., Jin, M., & Huang, H. (2020). Transformer winding fault diagnosis using vibration image and deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 36(2), 676–685.

Karunianingrum, D. I., & Widyastuti, H. (2020). Penilaian Indeks Kualitas Jalan Rel (Track Quality Index) berdasarkan Standar Perkeretaapian Indonesia (Studi Kasus: Cirebon-Cikampek). Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik Sipil, 18(1), 81–86.

Koziol, P. (2016). Experimental validation of wavelet based solution for dynamic response of railway track subjected to a moving train. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 79, 174–181.

Li, X., Kang, Y., & Li, F. (2020). Forecasting with time series imaging. Expert Systems with Applications, 160, 113680.

Liu, C., Thompson, D., Griffin, M. J., & Entezami, M. (2020). Effect of train speed and track geometry on the ride comfort in high-speed railways based on ISO 2631-1. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 234(7), 765–778.

Ma, K., Chang’an, A. Z., & Yang, F. (2022). Multi-classification of arrhythmias using ResNet with CBAM on CWGAN-GP augmented ECG Gramian Angular Summation Field. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 77, 103684.

Seibold, M., Hoch, A., Farshad, M., Navab, N., & Fürnstahl, P. (2022). Conditional generative data augmentation for clinical audio datasets. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 345–354.

Tsunashima, H. (2019). Condition monitoring of railway tracks from car-body vibration using a machine learning technique. Applied Sciences, 9(13), 2734.

Tsunashima, H., & Hirose, R. (2022). Condition monitoring of railway track from car-body vibration using time–frequency analysis. Vehicle System Dynamics, 60(4), 1170–1187.

Wang, Y., Zou, Y., Hu, W., Chen, J., & Xiao, Z. (2023). Intelligent fault diagnosis of hydroelectric units based on radar maps and improved GoogleNet by depthwise separate convolution. Measurement Science and Technology, 35(2), 25103.

Wicaksono, S., Husodo, H. T., & Mahyuddin, A. I. (2019). Dynamic analysis of Bangladesh’s broad gauge train using multibody system. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2187(1).

Wikaranadhi, P., Alfian, S. D., Handoko, Y. A., & Palar, P. S. (2024). Railway track vertical irregularities classification based on vehicle response using machine learning method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2739(1), 12054.

Yang, J., Sun, Y., Chen, Y., Mao, M., Bai, L., & Zhang, S. (2024). Time series-to-image encoding for saturation line prediction using channel and spatial-wise attention network. Expert Systems with Applications, 237, 121440.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-27

How to Cite

Pratama, G. G., Virdyawan, V. ., & Handoko, Y. A. . (2025). Classification of Vertical and Lateral Track Irregularities using GoogleNet from Gramian Angular Summation Field Encoding. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 5(2), 2567–2577. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i2.50895