Conflict In Prosecuting Criminal Actions Against Someone With Digital Proof Evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i1.1514Keywords:
Criminal Conflict, Crime, Digital EvidenceAbstract
The Criminal Law Book (abbreviated as the Criminal Code) contains instructions and descriptions regarding offenses, criminal acts, criminal acts, criminal incidents, namely regulations regarding the conditions or elements of whether or not a person can be sentenced to a crime (punishment) and rules regarding punishment, namely regulating who and how the sentence is imposed. Valid evidence in criminal case trials according to Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code are: Witness Statements, Expert Statements, Letters, Instructions and Defendant Statements. So the judge can use his freedom of independence to assess the strength of the evidence with a guide in certain circumstances. The formulation of the problem is in accordance with the introductory explanation above, namely: What is the legal position of the dispute over digital guidance devices referred to as CCTV in criminal trials? Why can the clue evidence referred to by CCTV influence the judge's confidence in deciding the criminal case? This study is about Normative Juridical Analysis of the existence of related digital aid complications which are used as a means of evidence in police investigations up to the court stage.
References
Baehaqi, E. S. (2022). Keturutsertaan Dalam Tindak Pidana. An-Nahdliyyah Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 1(1).
Byprojustice. (2021). Kumpulan Teori Hukum Menurut Para Ahli. Byprojustice.
Dewi, N. M. T., & Sukardi, N. M. R. (2023). Kekuatan Hukum Tanda Tangan Digital Dalam Pembuktian Sengketa Perdata Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha, 6(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.47532/Jirk.V6i2.927
Farid, M. (2020). Penyebarluasan Informasi Mengenai Bentuk Dan Macam Tindakan Cyberbullying Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Dan Upaya Pencegahannya Melalui Keb. Jurnal Sumbangsih, 1(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.23960/Jsh.V1i1.11
Gunawan, H. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) Di Media Sosial Dikaitkan Dengan Kebebasan Berpendapat Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Res Nullius Law Journal, 2(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.34010/Rnlj.V2i1.2923
Kumalasari, T. (2020). Konsep “Antargolongan” Dalam Pasal 28 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE). Media Iuris, 3(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.20473/Mi.V3i2.20892
Nelson, R., Tampanguma, M. Y., & Rewah, R. M. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Mengenai Pembuktian Informasi Elektronik (Digital Evidence) Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Lex Privatum, 10(5).
Pieter, S., & Silambi, E. D. (2019). Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Ditinjau Dari Kitab Udang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Restorative Justice, 3(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.35724/Jrj.V3i1.1940
Purnama, T., & Sulaiman. (2023). Penetapan Status Tersangka Oleh Hakim Melalui Proses Persidangan Dalam Perspektif Pembaruan Hukum Acara Pidana. Cendekia : Jurnal Hukum, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(2).
Rompis, N., Rumimpunu, D., & Sepang, M. (2020). Batalnya Surat Dakwaan Menurut Hukum Acara Pidana. E Journal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat (LEX ET SOCIETATIS), IX(4).
Tan, K. (2022). Analisa Pasal Karet Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Terhadap Asas Kejelasan Rumusan. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 17(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.33059/Jhsk.V17i1.3376
Tim Hukumonline. (2022). Teori-Teori Perlindungan Hukum Menurut Para Ahli. Hukumonline.Com.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhamad Jamalih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
