Business Sustainability of Food and Beverage Companies in The Asean Capital Market: The Role of Risk Management to Enhance Financial Resilience

Autori

  • Intan Jauharul Makhnun Universitas Pembangunan Nasional ”Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Indrawati Yuhertiana Universitas Pembangunan Nasional ”Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Siti Sundari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional ”Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i2.50805

##semicolon##

Sustainability report##common.commaListSeparator## Enterprise Risk Management##common.commaListSeparator## Financial Resilience##common.commaListSeparator## Economic Value Added

Abstrakt

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of sustainability reports on financial resilience in food and beverage companies in capital market of ASEAN countries and analyze the role of Enterprise Risk Management in modifying effect of the relationship. The index used as a sustainability report guideline in this study is based on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) 2021. Meanwhile, the index used to measure Enterprise Risk Management is using COSO - ERM. The population of this study are food and beverage industry companies listed on the stock exchange of each ASEAN country in 2022-2023. Companies that become samples are selected using purposive sampling method with certain criteria. The type of data used is secondary data. The results showed that sustainability reports had no effect on Economic Value Added, and Enterprise Risk Management had no role in moderating effect of sustainability reports on Economic Value Added. Although ERM is designed to reduce risk and increase stability, this study suggests that ERM may not be sufficiently integrated with sustainability initiatives to influence financial resilience as measured by EVA. Sustainability initiatives reported in the SR are more oriented towards long-term impacts related to environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Due to this difference in focus, ERM is often not directly involved in managing or measuring the effectiveness of sustainability initiatives, leading to a lack of synergy between two approaches. The implications of this study can help companies to pay more attention to sustainability practices and strengthen risk management to improve financial resilience.

##submission.citations##

Adissa, A. R., & Septiani, A. (2022). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Sustainability Report Dalam Memoderasi Hubungan Pengungkapan Enterprise Risk Management (Erm) Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI tahun 2016-2020). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 11(4).

Alhabsyi, A. K., & Hwihanus, H. (2024). Pengaruh fundamental makro, fundamental mikro, struktur kepemilikan, struktur modal terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan kinerja keuangan sebagai variabel intervening pada perusahaan subsektor makanan dan minuman yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2020-2022. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan, 4(1), 14–21.

Eppinga, M. B., Mijts, E. N., & Santos, M. J. (2022). Ranking the sustainable development goals: perceived sustainability priorities in small island states. Sustainability Science, 17(4), 1537–1556.

Foo, S. L., & Cheng, N. S. (2016). Risk Management in a VUCA Environment: Some key considerations.

Husnaini, W., & Basuki, B. (2020). ASEAN corporate governance scorecard: sustainability reporting and firm value. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 315–326.

Ishikawa, K. (2021). The ASEAN Economic Community and ASEAN economic integration. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 10(1), 24–41.

Kyere, M., & Ausloos, M. (2021). Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 1871–1885.

Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2023). The real effects of ESG reporting and GRI standards on carbon mitigation: International evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 2985–3000.

Mulyadi, M. (2011). Penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif serta pemikiran dasar menggabungkannya. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 15(1), 128–137.

Ratnasari, D. D., & Pandin, M. Y. R. (2023). Application of Financial Resilience To Corporate Sosial Responsibility Where Financial Performance Is The Intervening Variabel.

Renault, B. Y., Agumba, J. N., & Balogun, O. A. (2016). Drivers for and obstacles to enterprise risk management in construction firms: A literature review. Procedia Engineering, 164, 402–408.

Susilowati, E., Joseph, C., Vendy, V., Yuhertiana, I., Ardiyanti, A., & Putri, A. F. (2023). The Corporate Governance Mechanisms in ASEAN Context: A Literature Review. Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings, 538–542.

Tripathi, P. M., Chotia, V., Solanki, U., Meena, R., & Khandelwal, V. (2022). Economic value added research: Mapping thematic structure and research trends. Risks, 11(1), 9.

Yuhertiana, I. (2023). Unleashing creative performance accounting students. JASF: Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 6(1), 155–171.

Yuhertiana, I., Zakaria, M., Suhartini, D., & Sukiswo, H. W. (2022). Cooperative resilience during the pandemic: Indonesia and Malaysia evidence. Sustainability, 14(10), 5839.

Ziolo, M., Bak, I., & Cheba, K. (2021). The role of sustainable finance in achieving sustainable development goals: Does it work? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(1), 45–70.

##submission.downloads##

Publikované

2025-02-20