Complexities and Challenges of Compulsory Military Service for Generation Z: A Legal Review of Law No. 23 of 2019 on National Defense Resource Management
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i2.50839##semicolon##
military conscription##common.commaListSeparator## generation z##common.commaListSeparator## national defense##common.commaListSeparator## law 23/2019##common.commaListSeparator## national securityAbstrakt
The complexity and challenges of military conscription for Generation Z in Indonesia are crucial topics in national defense discussions. This article analyzes the implementation of Law Number 23 of 2019 on National Resource Management for State Defense in enhancing Generation Z’s national defense awareness. According to Litbang Kompas data, 57.6% of Generation Z are uninterested in joining the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI). Factors such as generational differences, psychosocial challenges, and misalignment with career aspirations pose significant obstacles to implementing military conscription. Additionally, the multi-actor dynamics and complexities of defense policy coordination further complicate human resource management in the national defense system. This article recommends a more flexible approach to conscription, including a voluntary system, incentives for participants, and the integration of technology in training programs. Thus, the national defense program can be more adaptive and inclusive for Generation Z. This study highlights the importance of balancing national defense obligations with individual rights and strengthening technology-based defense strategies to address modern threats.
##submission.citations##
Alfawaire, F., & Atan, T. (2021). The effect of strategic human resource and knowledge management on sustainable competitive advantages at Jordanian universities: The mediating role of organizational innovation. Sustainability, 13(15), 8445.
Davis, P. K. (2020). Defense planning when major changes are needed. In Defence Planning as Strategic Fact (pp. 122–138). Routledge.
Degaut, M. (2017). Brazil’s military modernization: Is a new strategic culture emerging. Rising Powers Quarterly, 2(1), 271–297.
Edmunds, T., Dawes, A., Higate, P., Jenkings, K. N., & Woodward, R. (2016). Reserve forces and the transformation of British military organisation: soldiers, citizens and society. Defence Studies, 16(2), 118–136.
Erbel, M. (2017). The underlying causes of military outsourcing in the USA and UK: bridging the persistent gap between ends, ways and means since the beginning of the Cold War. Defence Studies, 17(2), 135–155.
Harrison, A. J., Rao, B., & Mulloth, B. (2017). Developing an innovation-based ecosystem at the US Department of Defense: Challenges and opportunities.
Heibach, J., & Taş, H. (2024). Beyond the Soft–Hard Power Binary: Resource Control in Turkey’s Foreign Policy Towards Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 26(3), 311–326.
Jankauskas, M. (2025). The role of citizens in the implementation of total defence principle in Lithuania. Kauno technologijos universitetas.
Mares, D. R., & Trinkunas, H. A. (2016). Aspirational power: Brazil on the long road to global influence. Brookings Institution Press.
Porter, P. (2018). Why America’s grand strategy has not changed: Power, habit, and the US Foreign policy establishment. International Security, 42(4), 9–46.
Price, R. (2021). Overview of political economy analysis frameworks in the area of climate governance and key issues to consider.
Saxi, H. L. (2017). British and German initiatives for defence cooperation: the Joint Expeditionary Force and the Framework Nations Concept. Defence Studies, 17(2), 171–197.
Suman, T., Pandey, A., Mishra, A., & Kiran, P. (2025). Balancing Power and Diplomacy: Unravelling the Iran Nuclear Deal and Chile’s Soft Power Strategy. In Exploring the Implications of Local and Regional Conflicts (pp. 369–400). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Tama, J. (2020). Tradeoffs in defense strategic planning: lessons from the US quadrennial defense review. In Defence Planning as Strategic Fact (pp. 27–49). Routledge.
Worker, J. (2017). National climate change governance-Topic guide-August 2016.
##submission.downloads##
Publikované
##submission.howToCite##
Číslo
Sekcia
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-sa4.footer##